Padron 1964 maduro or Liga Privada #9
Options

christian1971
Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 392
in Cigar 101
Comments
-
I've had both (thanks to the kind bombers around here).
Pushing aside scarceness of supply and hype, I really loved the only Padron 1964 I ever hard.
I was also given two T9s by kind people. The first one tasted like tal wrapped in fireplace ashes. The second one tasted like bark from a tree that had been scorched by lightning. For me, they were the most overrated cigars I've ever smoked. The few Undercrowns I've had are much, much, better although to me they're nothing special.
And if it looks like I'm being overly Padron biased, I did smoke an Opus X another kind person here gave me. It was my birthday smoke. It was quite pleasant, but it didn't deliver the life-changing experience I thought a $20 cigar should. -
I always will go padron on this decision but I don't really do de so I'm biased...but the padron is the cigar that got me hooked and it's less expensive then the ligas
-
smoke both....simultaneously. #baller
serious answer though....keep in mind i'm not a huge fan of the 9 (it's good but i prefer the t52)......so of your two original choices i'd say go with the padron.
if not go with the t52, don't pay more than $15 for a single though.. some places have the liga privada prices hiked up stupid crazy. -
Good answers. Thank you.
-
awesome. I guess I'm #baller ......... let me see if I can find itjgibv:smoke both....simultaneously. #baller
serious answer though....keep in mind i'm not a huge fan of the 9 (it's good but i prefer the t52)......so of your two original choices i'd say go with the padron.
if not go with the t52, don't pay more than $15 for a single though.. some places have the liga privada prices hiked up stupid crazy. -
Never had a #9 but have had the T-52 and a few of the unico's and undercrown and liked them but much prefer the Padrone.
-
Not even a fair contest. I'd take even a normal Padron over a liga any day.