Pheebs - CATO is a respected think tank, yet all you posted are left-wing blogs, NEA union sites, and opinion pieces from the NYT and time. Really Pheebs, c'mon. If you can't do better than opinion pieces or a progressive blog, you're really hurting for evidence.
Pheebs - CATO is a respected think tank, yet all you posted are left-wing blogs, NEA union sites, and opinion pieces from the NYT and time. Really Pheebs, c'mon. If you can't do better than opinion pieces or a progressive blog, you're really hurting for evidence.
Now Cmon....if you wanna consider his sources leftist I can hear it perhaps, but to call CATO of all things respected or reliable...outside of the right??? Not true at all. Hell, there was an article today in the St. Pete Times about how Florida's Governor is a spokesperson and talking point for CATO.
Everyone is drinking the kool aid here, myself included....unless some of you guys are making that 6,7,8 figure salaries. This is what the big donors---liberal and republican----really want. They have found a way to keep the poor to middling class complaining about the wealthy, and a way to keep the middle class and upper class complaining about the lower classes. In turn, everyone complains about everyone... and the most wealthy----who do no complaining of their own, they just hire people and influence opinion-----sit back and relax. Its a class warfare and mind warfare and everyone would rather argue about political tenets that only a select few in this country (or world for that matter) have the ability to change. Money is power, to believe otherwise is lunacy----and the money keeps all of us at each others throats while we work for Applebees, the state, police depts, manufacturing, ect. The money isnt there, its elsewhere but instead of collectively realizing that we woudl rather demonize one another and people making below the poverty line.
Agreed totally.....Also didnt mean to sound like I was saying the was a direct spokesperson, my obvious bias in the writing there. I was simply citing that as Pheebs sources may not be considered objective info, nor should CATO be.
Ask yourselves one very simple question. If a unions' purpose is to protect the worker, exactly who do we need to protect the public servant from? The public? Public sector unionization is self-defeating.
Comments