Obama Reaching Too FAR!!

phobicsquirrel

xmacro

Hays

Vulchor

Agreed with Pheebs and Hays on most all accounts, did seem personal too........That said Macro, I dont think he isnt saying we shouldnt tell dictators not to slaughter their people-----I think he is saying maybe we should TELL them and leave our men and women (and our money) out of it.

phobicsquirrel

Vulchor:

Agreed with Pheebs and Hays on most all accounts, did seem personal too........That said Macro, I dont think he isnt saying we shouldnt tell dictators not to slaughter their people-----I think he is saying maybe we should TELL them and leave our men and women (and our money) out of it.

Pretty much what I was getting at. And Macro, you seem to be just ... well I can't think of the word but I mean even when I attack obama you still have to pick a fight. Very one sided buddy. I challenge you to look at what happens when there is no check or control of your precious private entities. Look at the just released report on Messa (massi) Mines, seems as though they, if they actually cared for their employees could have avoided the deaths of their employees, however they chose not too to save a few bucks. This is so very consistent with corporations. Look at Behr, the pharmaceutical company, they have killed hundreds if not thousands of people and their still around. No care in the world. And the protections that are in place to stop it aren't being used, thus the gutting of our govt to protect us. Sure some regulations go to far but we as common people with no massive lobbying interest need govt protection, but it's more or less turned on us.

alienmisprint

Vulchor:

Agreed with Pheebs and Hays on most all accounts, did seem personal too........That said Macro, I dont think he isnt saying we shouldnt tell dictators not to slaughter their people-----I think he is saying maybe we should TELL them and leave our men and women (and our money) out of it.

If we had continued the course of action as described above for WWII, more or less just let the outside world be, we would probably be typing this in German right now. That is, if we had internet access and the right to publicly proclaim our opinions. Just sayin'.

phobicsquirrel

alienmisprint:

Vulchor:

Agreed with Pheebs and Hays on most all accounts, did seem personal too........That said Macro, I dont think he isnt saying we shouldnt tell dictators not to slaughter their people-----I think he is saying maybe we should TELL them and leave our men and women (and our money) out of it.

If we had continued the course of action as described above for WWII, more or less just let the outside world be, we would probably be typing this in German right now. That is, if we had internet access and the right to publicly proclaim our opinions. Just sayin'.

I dunno, I mean it's one thing to actually go to war to protect this country but to instill dictators, govt's and then to dictate to other countries how to act is not right. I mean we blasted communism for decades, however we basically didn't say crap about China and do most of our business with them, but cuba or Soviet Union, oh hell no. Our military is not being used to protect this country, it's being used to protect private interests. I mean the middle east conflicts are because of oil rights. Even WW2 for us started because of the US crippling Japan from OIL. Also rumor is FDR allowed Pearl Harbor to happen though he and the DOD thought the attack was going to happen some other place than Pearl. This country has more blood on its hands than any other.

cabinetmaker

phobicsquirrel:

alienmisprint:

Vulchor:

Agreed with Pheebs and Hays on most all accounts, did seem personal too........That said Macro, I dont think he isnt saying we shouldnt tell dictators not to slaughter their people-----I think he is saying maybe we should TELL them and leave our men and women (and our money) out of it.

If we had continued the course of action as described above for WWII, more or less just let the outside world be, we would probably be typing this in German right now. That is, if we had internet access and the right to publicly proclaim our opinions. Just sayin'.

I dunno, I mean it's one thing to actually go to war to protect this country but to instill dictators, govt's and then to dictate to other countries how to act is not right. I mean we blasted communism for decades, however we basically didn't say crap about China and do most of our business with them, but cuba or Soviet Union, oh hell no. Our military is not being used to protect this country, it's being used to protect private interests. I mean the middle east conflicts are because of oil rights. Even WW2 for us started because of the US crippling Japan from OIL. Also rumor is FDR allowed Pearl Harbor to happen though he and the DOD thought the attack was going to happen some other place than Pearl. This country has more blood on its hands than any other.

Wrong, that was Winston Churchill. FDR was busy setting policies in place that we still suffer for today.

xmacro

phobicsquirrel

zoom6zoom

bige1371

So if you agree with attacking Gadaffi's forces then why not KimJungIl? He is a far worse dictator than Gadaffi. He actualy has a Camp for political prisoners much like that of Nazi Germany. They test chemicals on the prisoners and even have a glass gas chamber. Google camp 22. Oh that's right we would not benifit finacially from a war with North Korea like we will with a victory against Gadaffi. You could make an argument to go to war with many countries. How about we finish the two we are in first. Obama needs to stop trophy hunting and just shoot a doe.

Knoxca1

Kim Jong Il does not have any oil.

sdloco30

Luko