So, I always find it interesting how before one becomes president they appose conflict or war, especially without congressional approval (for democrats mostly btw), however Obama seems to think a bit different now. An article taken from the huffingtonpost
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/20/obama-libya-involvement-limited-congress_n_865035.html
For most of us "liberals" we think armed conflict should and can be avoided however we usually do agree that sometimes it needs to be done. However there needs to be a good reason. Now since we already have such a debt problem, thanks in part of recklessness from both parties and which still seems to be happening; we or should I say our president spends billions of dollars in lybia. While we do that, spend money in Iraq and Afghanistan, we have millions of people out of work, out of unemployment, out of healthcare, teachers being fired, schools being closed, police and firefighters being laid off, state employees being fired, social services being targeted, and the list can go on. BUT we must spend money on bombs. I for one am sick of it. I mean wtf!
Thankfully NATO is taking control of most of this crap but still, we shouldn't even be involved. I personally think that since "WE" as a country are not even close to being united, or have even fixed some of our most critical issues, and have corporations running and ruining our so called democracy; we have no right in telling others how to do things. It's insulting as an American and a human. It's like being murderer and then tell people not to kill. It makes no friggin sense.
