5 Vegas Cask Strength
cheyman
Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 157
Does anyone have any thoughts on this cigar? I'm a fan of the 5 Vegas line, and I'm not sure how this one ended up in my humidor. Just curious if anyone has tried it.
Comments
I wish i had more. they are becoming harder and harder to find. Im fairly sure ill never be able to smoke the original again.
thank god there is a 5VCS II !!
just read a post by Kuzi on a different thread about the original Cask Strength vs CS2. Didn't want to hijack that thread so I thought I'd ask here....what's the difference between them - taste/flavor/strength wise?
I love the Cask Strength and didn't realize there were different "versions" of this cigar. I've noticed the "2" in the name before but never thought much of it.
I'm assuming I have the CS2 since they were purchased within the past 6 months and have the maroon-ish label, even though they don't say "2".
Any info on the difference between CS1 and CS2 would be much appreciated, and anyone know where I can grab some CS1s. I'd love to see how these compare.
cigar.com has them listed correctly as the "Cask Strength II"
hope that helps
Also, do you know what year(s) the original CS was produced? Also was it the same, box-pressed toro, vitola as the CS2?
Thanks again Kuzi!
wow
Here is a close up of the band
Here is a closeup of the band on the foot
Found description on the web regarding the original CS:
Size: 5.75 X 54 Toro
Wrapper: Cuban Seed Dominican
Binder: Dominican Corojo
Filler: Brazilian ('99), Piloto Cubano ('99), Nicaraguan('99)
Body: Med-Full
Strength: Medium
How was the original CS when you smoked it three months ago?
Remember, I'm going on memory, but I have smoked enough of them to be fairly accurate on memory. I do know when I fire one up, I take my time with it, as I know once they are gone, there are no more.
They have a completely different taste/profile than the newer CS maroon label which could be attributed to the age on them now. I remember loving the original many years ago, and kept about a number of them to see how age would progress them. I was glad I did. Over the years I was smoking 2 or 3 a year until a couple years ago or so when I had 5 left.
There is a sweet almost caramelish/peanut scent mixed with a cedar whiff on first light, intermingled with what reminds me of Fall season when walking in a forest. There is a certain smell to the air during that time of year. Not quite what others term 'damp earth', but hard to put my finger on. The first third has a mild pepper flavor to it with traces of a sweet butterscotch, and nuances of leather, almond, and pure tobacco. Plus its quite creamy, with hints of a mild coffee.
The second third I pick up a stronger cedar and woody profile, especially on the retrohale where the creaminess, cedar, nut, and a sweet spice stand out. The cigar never gets bitter, harsh, or overpowering even at the end. Its definitely a medium strength, with a lot of complexity, and a lot of trace flavors.
The last third, the pepperiness picks up just enough, but never overpowering, and picks up an espresso, leather, earth, with dark chocolate. Its definitely a cigar, over the years, I have nubbed, to the point of almost blistering my finger tips. I also normally drink coffee, or bourbon, scotch, martini, diet coke, or something when I smoke cigars, but in the case of the original CS, I will only drink cool, but not cold, filtered water. The cigar stands out on its own.
The most "aged" CS2 I've smoked had close to a year on it, and it was certainly a different smoke than it was right out of the box. I'll have to let some CS2s sit for a few years and see how they turn out.
Also, Kuzi you were right about it being a LE leaf. I dug around a little more online and found a review/description about the original CS on a different website.
I've copied it below for anyone who's interested.
You figure they were released at least 5 years ago? And as Kuzi originally pointed out it was a 1 time-ltd edition run....(of only 60,000 cigars).
For what it's worth, I've never seen any at the B&Ms around here.