NO, example, One could become indescribably more evil in his cause to destroy an evil thus by his actions exceeding the evil he is attempting to destroy.
I'm pretty much in line with the above answers, the idea may be tempting, but to go forward can only be rationalization. It is the tippy-top of the slippery slope.
The problem here is that this is gray area question that really involves a definitive yes/no answer but in nature is going to evoke a gray area answer. So it depends on what the ends are and who they hurt. Personally, I believe no. However, there are certain situations (life/death) where I think this question does not have relevance and the ends most certainly justify the means.
To answer your first question... I think it's hard for anybody to really give an honest answer until they are in a specific situation that would warrant this type of decision. For example... If somebody every hurt my little girl, I would do things to them that not even I could presently imagine to be possible. As previously said, humans are the only species that would even raise this question. By societies standards, of course the answer is no. But it's that same society that let a young mother go free this summer after murdering her daughter (I know, another topic all together), so I have a hard time agreeing with with what society inherently decides as right and wrong when it's not their livelihood at stake.
Let's go Red Sox.
Comments