Luko:Hey you got Jeff Saturday...that's a big splash.
Yea but thats all we ever do is re-sign our own but hey it works
dutyje:I saw an article yesterday that compared the performance of teams that made huge free agent plays against those who didn't.... let's just say it did not look favorable for the Redskins. They really need a new owner.
You can't argue with the success the Colts have had signing their own guys and using the draft
gmill880:The only splash the Colts ever make in free agency is the sound of their free agents splashing down in the free agent pool
urbino: gmill880:The only splash the Colts ever make in free agency is the sound of their free agents splashing down in the free agent pool Like Marvin Harrison. Wow. That was a shock.
If you follow the Colts it really wasn't that big a shock. Everyone (coaches,players) were saying how they wanted him back and he had not lost a step yadda yadda yadda. But everyone knows its a business....they were all playing nice in case he decided to take the pay cut he was offered and stay. In reality, he did not seem in sync with Manning at all last year,maybe due to Manning missing training camp maybe not. Truth is ( and I am a huge Harrison fan) you can't afford that kind of money for a number 2 receiver and thats what he was on the Colts...Manning had moved on to Reggie Wayne as his go-to guy. I hate to see him in another uniform but I would have hated to see that kinda money with the salary cap and all spent on Marvin (sorry Marv) the results just did not justify it. He is a Hall of Famer no doubt...We Colts fans will miss ya Marv...thanks for the memories ....It sucks but its a business...getting old in any sports takes a toll even on a physical beast like Marv ...
urbino:Yeah, I'd certainly noticed he wasn't what he used to be. I guess I was just surprised the Colts so abruptly dumped him, not having followed the negotiations like you have. It's sorta like the Bucs dumping Derrick Brooks. You understand it as a football-business matter, but it's just weird.
It will be weird not seeing him out there. "Bino you guys looking at anybody on FA ?
urbino:Nothing flashy. We picked up Gibril Wilson, who'll get us younger in the secondary, give us a safety who's more of an interception threat, and along with Yeremiah Bell, give us 2 very hard-hitting safeties. We signed Joe Berger from the Cowboys. He's not great, but he'll probably compete for the starting center job; we're a bit undersized there. There's some talk we'll sign Laveranues Coles. The Jets cut him, and he and Pennington are great friends and like playing together. Other than that, we re-signed a couple of our own guys. That's it. We were interested in Jason Brown, but when the Rams offered him waaaaaaay too much money, we took a pass (and signed Berger).
Sounds like their on the move...should be fun to watch this season
madurofan:My only concern is the only two years the Haynesworth was trully dominant was when he was playing for a contract. Prior to that he was a trouble maker and just barely above average.
urbino: madurofan:My only concern is the only two years the Haynesworth was trully dominant was when he was playing for a contract. Prior to that he was a trouble maker and just barely above average. Yeah, that's what I was getting at. It struck me as a high-risk play, offering him that long a contract, worth that much money, and so much of it guaranteed. You might end up with an unmotivated, underperforming salary cap anchor. Plus, he hardly ever plays a full season, anyway, due to injury.
Luko: urbino: madurofan:My only concern is the only two years the Haynesworth was trully dominant was when he was playing for a contract. Prior to that he was a trouble maker and just barely above average. Yeah, that's what I was getting at. It struck me as a high-risk play, offering him that long a contract, worth that much money, and so much of it guaranteed. You might end up with an unmotivated, underperforming salary cap anchor. Plus, he hardly ever plays a full season, anyway, due to injury. You're right Urbi...I don't think Haynesworth is "worth" the trouble. He hasn't played a full season (I think he averages about 12 games a seasaon). According to Peter King, he's never played more than 65 percent of his team's defensive snaps in a season. Plus, he's way over 3 bills and 28 years old. So he may be a great d-lineman, but they just gave him franchise qb money. Them there's different things.
madurofan: Luko: urbino: madurofan:My only concern is the only two years the Haynesworth was trully dominant was when he was playing for a contract. Prior to that he was a trouble maker and just barely above average. Yeah, that's what I was getting at. It struck me as a high-risk play, offering him that long a contract, worth that much money, and so much of it guaranteed. You might end up with an unmotivated, underperforming salary cap anchor. Plus, he hardly ever plays a full season, anyway, due to injury. You're right Urbi...I don't think Haynesworth is "worth" the trouble. He hasn't played a full season (I think he averages about 12 games a seasaon). According to Peter King, he's never played more than 65 percent of his team's defensive snaps in a season. Plus, he's way over 3 bills and 28 years old. So he may be a great d-lineman, but they just gave him franchise qb money. Them there's different things.First off Peter King is an idiot. I listen to the moron a couple times every week on Sirius NFL channel. This is the same moron that still believes Art Monk shouldn't be in the Hall of Fame.No big man plays more than 70% of the time. In the modern NFL DTs are rotated in and out. The Titans did this less than most teams and caused the big guys to wear out quicker. THe Skins are much deeper at DT than the Titans and Haynesworth will be spelled more here than he was there. You also have to take into that 12 game average he was once suspended for 5 games. I'm not saying he's not a risk but I think his talent is worth the risk. I'm good with the Skins moves so far. Signing Dockery back was one helluva deal too. He's a big upgrade over Pete Kendall particularly in age.
urbino:I've seen those rumors, too, gm. The talk out of Miami, though, is they're not interested in him -- or Coles. They don't see either of them as what they're looking for in a WR right now.
madurofan:King is that bad. He's a moron and has quite a rep for stealing stories, his "scoops" are usually him claiming that he's breaking a story that some local reporter has already broke. Palantonio is bad about that as well.It is a ton of money but one thing the Redskins never seem to have is salary cap issues. Our cap guy is AMAZING. P.S. the deal is really only a 4 year 48 million dollar deal, the other 3 years and 52 mill are fluff.
Well damn, I would hate it Maddy, but jeezzz , GUESS 48 million over 4 years would be ok , I mean what with a recession and all I guess I could sacrafice ....lol