Quick form from ruger for email to reps, legs, etc.

jj20030

http://www.ruger.com/micros/advocacy/takeAction.html

Rain

"instead, work to enforce the more than 20,000 gun laws already on the books. "Yep..that's a lot of gun laws. Like I read yesterday..."Laws don't protect you, they say what will happen when they are broken."

jadelt

We just need more laws and regulations. Hey I have an idea...... lets make a law so it is illegal for crazy people to steel guns and kill people. Yep that will fix the problem.

JDH

Assault weapons belong on the battlefield, because that's what they were designed for, not in the general population of a civil society, unless you want your society to become a bloody battlefield.

beatnic

JDH:

Assult weapons belong on the battlefield, because that's what they were designed for, not in the general population of a civil society, unless you want your society to become a bloody battlefield.

And when the government comes for the citizen's guns, the people will have the weapons to win on that bloody battlefield. I see that you are an enforcement officer. Do you carry a weapon?

JDH

beatnic:

JDH:

Assault weapons belong on the battlefield, because that's what they were designed for, not in the general population of a civil society, unless you want your society to become a bloody battlefield.

And when the government comes for the citizen's guns, the people will have the weapons to win on that bloody battlefield. I see that you are an enforcement officer. Do you carry a weapon?

The US Supreme Court has ruled that individuals have the right to keep and bear arms, and therefore any US citizen who believes that they need to have assault weapons to prevent the Government from taking their guns away has lost all faith in our form of government, and is either a criminal or a paranoid wingnut. Additionally, when the Supreme Court made that ruling, they also stated that gun ownership can be regulated, and that regulation is long overdue.

beatnic

JDH:

beatnic:

JDH:

Assault weapons belong on the battlefield, because that's what they were designed for, not in the general population of a civil society, unless you want your society to become a bloody battlefield.

And when the government comes for the citizen's guns, the people will have the weapons to win on that bloody battlefield. I see that you are an enforcement officer. Do you carry a weapon?

The US Supreme Court has ruled that individuals have the right to keep and bear arms, and therefore any US citizen who believes that they need to have assault weapons to prevent the Government from taking their guns away has lost all faith in our form of government, and is either a criminal or a paranoid wingnut. Additionally, when the Supreme Court made that ruling, they also stated that gun ownership can be regulated, and that regulation is long overdue.

How would you define "assault weapon"? Do you carry a weapon?

JDH

beatnic:

JDH:

beatnic:

JDH:

Assault weapons belong on the battlefield, because that's what they were designed for, not in the general population of a civil society, unless you want your society to become a bloody battlefield.

And when the government comes for the citizen's guns, the people will have the weapons to win on that bloody battlefield. I see that you are an enforcement officer. Do you carry a weapon?

The US Supreme Court has ruled that individuals have the right to keep and bear arms, and therefore any US citizen who believes that they need to have assault weapons to prevent the Government from taking their guns away has lost all faith in our form of government, and is either a criminal or a paranoid wingnut. Additionally, when the Supreme Court made that ruling, they also stated that gun ownership can be regulated, and that regulation is long overdue.

How would you define "assault weapon"? Do you carry a weapon?

It doesn't matter how I would define assault weapon. Our lawmakers will do that. Enough is enough. It is long past time for this battlefield slaughter in our schools and our movie houses and our public places to end.

beatnic

JDH:

beatnic:

JDH:

beatnic:

JDH:

Assault weapons belong on the battlefield, because that's what they were designed for, not in the general population of a civil society, unless you want your society to become a bloody battlefield.

And when the government comes for the citizen's guns, the people will have the weapons to win on that bloody battlefield. I see that you are an enforcement officer. Do you carry a weapon?

The US Supreme Court has ruled that individuals have the right to keep and bear arms, and therefore any US citizen who believes that they need to have assault weapons to prevent the Government from taking their guns away has lost all faith in our form of government, and is either a criminal or a paranoid wingnut. Additionally, when the Supreme Court made that ruling, they also stated that gun ownership can be regulated, and that regulation is long overdue.

How would you define "assault weapon"? Do you carry a weapon?

It doesn't matter how I would define assault weapon. Our lawmakers will do that. Enough is enough. It is long past time for this battlefield slaughter in our schools and our movie houses and our public places to end.

I see. They'll tell us what an assault weapon is after they sign the bill. And what happened in all those incidents you mention was not a battlefield because only one side was armed. Now, if someone with a concealed weapon was in that audience? Or even if the attackers believed someone could shoot back? It probably wouldn't have happened.

jadelt

JDH:

Assault weapons belong on the battlefield, because that's what they were designed for, not in the general population of a civil society, unless you want your society to become a bloody battlefield.

And you shouldnt have access to the internet because it was designed for the dept of defense not public use.

JDH

JDH

jadelt

Rain

Everyone in my unit for two deployments was armed..pistols, rifles and automatic weapons. None of them shot each other, and I PROMISE you it's not because they are all of high morals. Walk in to a building down range and start shooting, and see how far you get...The Fort Hood shooting would have been over REAL quick if those soldiers had been armed.Jim had a point I liked. That kid that brought a shotgun to school and shot the bully? Nobody wants to ban shotguns..

brianetz1

beatnic

JDH

Rain

marineatbn03

Why ban "assault rifles"? What ia an assualt rifle? A rifle that kills someone? This is silly. A person with a pistol can cause as much damage as on e with an AR. And it can be concealed better. More laws do not fix the problems, because criminals do not abide by them. Anything can be bought illegally, so, all you are going to do is punish the other 98% that follow the laws. I don't think the government is coming for me, I think its the criminal who wants my wallet, car, or posessions. Thats why I own and keep guns.

beatnic

beatnic

jthanatos

Everything this guy did was already illegal. Why would making it Super Duper Double Secret Illegal stop him? Also, for an example of not only high gun ownership, but high assault weapon ownership, why not look at the Swiss. Guns don't do this. People do. I will agree there must be something particularly screwed up in the US that makes our murder rate so high... but gun ownership is not a root cause.

jadelt

The Kid

http://www.sfgate.com/nation/article/Defiance-discretion-at-Vegas-gun-show-4197442.php

brianetz1

jthanatos

JDH

Rain

At least we can have swords....for now. Those only belong on the battlefield

JDH

Rain:

At least we can have swords....for now. Those only belong on the battlefield

Anyone who wants access to these military weapons can have it. All they have to do is join the "well regulated militia" (see the US Constitution, 2nd Amendment) also known as the National Guard, or any of the other branches of the Armed Forces of the United States. That's where these weapons belong, not among the general population.

Rain

JDH:

Rain:

At least we can have swords....for now. Those only belong on the battlefield

Anyone who wants access to these military weapons can have it. All they have to do is join the "well regulated militia" (see the US Constitution, 2nd Amendment) also known as the National Guard, or any of the other branches of the Armed Forces of the United States. That's where these weapons belong, not among the general population.

Ok.

beatnic

JDH:

Rain:

At least we can have swords....for now. Those only belong on the battlefield

Anyone who wants access to these military weapons can have it. All they have to do is join the "well regulated militia" (see the US Constitution, 2nd Amendment) also known as the National Guard, or any of the other branches of the Armed Forces of the United States. That's where these weapons belong, not among the general population.

So, what's the deal with whether it has a pistol grip or common grip? Attitude?