Gran Habano Corojo Vintage 2002 - Short Filler? Updated 7/1/13
Is this supposed to be short filler? Sure looks like short filler.
UPDATED on page 3
UPDATED on page 3
Comments
Some don't burn right. But that's also true of some long filler cigars. So I don't see that as dispositive. Not at all.
Some contain sweepings. Itty bits that shed shreds in your mouth and sparky bits all over your shirt. I got a bundle of cigar.com house blend sungrown that did that. Sent them back and they made it right. Sweepings are irritating as hell.
But when short filler consists of 4"x4" flakes, without itty bits, then it burns right and doesn't spit shreds. So, minus the snob factor, what's the diff?
This could be a fluke simply not enough info to jump to nailing the coffin.
Bob L., have you smoked any others from the mazo? Let us know how the others smoke. I'm wondering if I need to get a mazo if they truly are getting towards the end of this tobacco, or if it's already too late....or if we're creating a panic for no reason LOL!
"More cigars? Huh." (she smokes menthol cigarettes, bleah!)
By the next year, they weren't quite the same. The wrappers seemed to lack the oily sheen, the chocolate notes less pronounced, that certain Gran Habano spice was still there, though, and for the price (which I note has gone up) they were still my "go-to" cigar for quite awhile. I've wondered for awhile, though, how long will these be available, and will the quality continue to deteriorate?
Also, when the Churchills came out, they were too new for smoking. Smoked very poorly unless dry-boxed extensively. There was quite a stir over it, here, I remember Fla-Gypsy being quite vociferously outraged. Me too. Anyone smoking the churchills these days? Have they improved in smokability?