On the front lines of Pro Choice

beatnic

RBeckom

beatnic

Amos Umwhat

RBeckom

phobicsquirrel

jthanatos

Amos Umwhat

phobicsquirrel:

Now really how small is govt when it is making woman keep a pregnancy? That seems like it's far reaching and way more important than the govt want's to ban assault weapons... Making things illegal doesn't work. ... With some minor let's save the rich or attack these countries but no money to help our domestic issues.

On these points we agree.

perkinke

beatnic

kaspera79

phobicsquirrel

beatnic

phobicsquirrel

beatnic

RBeckom

RBeckom

phobicsquirrel

RBeckom

phobicsquirrel

RBeckom

phobicsquirrel

RBeckom

raisindot

phobicsquirrel

RBeckom

Vulchor

Less govt in business and insurance, but a throcratic dictatorship involving a women's honey pot and whenever f@gs wanna get married-------the republican plank for 2016.

Vulchor

Pardon my aggression or incivility there....it is meant at no one here at all I assure you, just a long day of work today------- and as the right gets tired of "my" lefties......it goes both ways.

perkinke

This is one of those conversations that always fascinates me for our inability to speak the same language, even though part of the language component is the same category but different angle. Many of the opponents speak in terms of religious morality, rejecting any other perspective. Many of the proponents speak in terms of legalisic morality and often explicitly reject the religious perspective. It makes it fascinating because really, those are the only two avenues for this discussion. Oh sure, both sides will rope science in at some point but this is not a question science can answer, it is entirely a philosophical/legal discussion. While there are some facts that science can supply, the importance or meaning of those items are open for either side to interpret or assign value to.

RBeckom

RBeckom