I haven't even smoked one and I'm let down. I got some in a bomb and just sitting in my humi they all split all over the stick! No big RH fluctuations. The temp had changed quite a bit over time but other than that... Didn't even get to smoke them.
I haven't even smoked one and I'm let down. I got some in a bomb and just sitting in my humi they all split all over the stick! No big RH fluctuations. The temp had changed quite a bit over time but other than that... Didn't even get to smoke them.
So now you don't even have to light em for them to fall apart? Sheez
I've gotten to the point with Gurkhas that I won't ever smoke or attempt to smoke another one. I've given them plenty of tries and in my opinion they just suck. I still have a bunch kicking around my humidors that I know I'll never touch or even gift to anyone because I wouldn't want them to have a bad cigar experience.
Others sites sell plenty of cheap cigars that will blow up as well, I do not fault Ccom for selling this crap, I fault Gurkha for packaging it as a premium and not what it truly is. A cheap bundle cigar worth a buck at most.
Others sites sell plenty of cheap cigars that will blow up as well, I do not fault Ccom for selling this crap, I fault Gurkha for packaging it as a premium and not what it truly is. A cheap bundle cigar worth a buck at most.
I don't really hate Gurkha.......... Not yet anyway. I'm just making fun with the apparent consensus here on the forums. I have yet to try several different ten packs I bought cheap on the sprint sales. I hope they don't suck too bad. I bought them back before I read all the bad stuff about them here. I'll try and keep an open mind. But until I try these, I'm not buying any more.
People especially the newer smoker see that msrp on them and read the bs about the Rolls Royce of cigars and see the "incredible deal" they are getting. But still I do enjoy a few of them. Never had any split in the humi before, that would tick me off. And as I always say you got to dry box any of them for a day before smoking.
Comments