RP Vintage 90 and 92

Options
christian1971
christian1971 Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 392
in Ratings & Reviews
I was told that rocky patel vintage 1990 and 1992 need to age a year before smoking. How are they rott? Are they worth the coin? Can they be compared to any other cigar?
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • Amos Umwhat
    Amos Umwhat Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 2,523
    I like them, give at least 4 weeks in the humidor and you should be good.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Rhamlin
    Rhamlin Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 4,530
    I don't like them with too much age on them. They lose something IMO. But a month or two is about right.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • kuzi16
    kuzi16 Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 14,471
    i used to like them more. im just not a huge RP fan. however, the 90 and 92 are the best they have to offer in my opinion. the 90 is better than the 92 in my opinion. the honduran wrapper does well for the blend.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Krieg
    Krieg Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 5,068
    The 90 and 92s are no where as good as they were in 08-09. I'd smoke them rott or give them a month. They don't have as much flavor as they used to. Older they get the less flavor they have now.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • kuzi16
    kuzi16 Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 14,471
    Krieg:
    The 90 and 92s are no where as good as they were in 08-09. I'd smoke them rott or give them a month. They don't have as much flavor as they used to. Older they get the less flavor they have now.
    im fairly sure they ran out of the real 90 and 92 vintage tobacco a long time ago.
    that line has been a best seller for RP for a decade. the "90" and "92" are just numbers to keep brand recognition. the "90" is just aged 12 years and the "92" is just aged 10 years.
    that is why they dont taste the same.


    either that or they had the largest tobacco field in history along with endless storage space.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Krieg
    Krieg Everyone, Registered Users Posts: 5,068
    kuzi16:
    Krieg:
    The 90 and 92s are no where as good as they were in 08-09. I'd smoke them rott or give them a month. They don't have as much flavor as they used to. Older they get the less flavor they have now.
    im fairly sure they ran out of the real 90 and 92 vintage tobacco a long time ago.
    that line has been a best seller for RP for a decade. the "90" and "92" are just numbers to keep brand recognition. the "90" is just aged 12 years and the "92" is just aged 10 years.
    that is why they dont taste the same.


    either that or they had the largest tobacco field in history along with endless storage space.
    yes sir...remember my old thread "Cigar Vintages??" lol ;)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Categories