I don't see how it's suppression to remove religious language from a legal document. It had no business there in the first place. It should also come off our money and everywhere else it shouldn't be.
I don't see how it's suppression to remove religious language from a legal document. It had no business there in the first place. It should also come off our money and everywhere else it shouldn't be.
I didn't think the terms husband and wife were religious terminology.
I don't see how it's suppression to remove religious language from a legal document. It had no business there in the first place. It should also come off our money and everywhere else it shouldn't be.
I didn't think the terms husband and wife were religious terminology.
Not that the terms are religious, per se, but they belong on something that would document the religious pact, not the legal one. I'm leaning towards "legal partner" as the government contract term.
Comments