I'm not sure I understand how issues are less manly than problems. I'm not a big fan of the word "challenges" though. Can't say why.
I shouldn't be surprised. You younger guys have grown up hearing issues replace problems and don't understand the evolution of the whole thing. Time-wise it all happened during the "every kid gets a trophy" phase of our recent history. And, I don't know if this was some vast left wing conspiracy or not but, plenty of squishy people thought that problem was just too harsh of a word. It meant bad things. It made people feel bad. Boo hoo hoo. They desired and craved a word to replace problem and they found a way to corrupt the word issues. And really, it wasn't too hard to do. Issues has always meant (among other definitions) a subject of debate or something to be discussed and or resolved on as in a political or private debate. See? Doesn't resolving issues already sound like solving problems? See how easy it was corrupt the word? However, I would hazard to guess that if you go back 40 years and beyond, you will find little if any use of the word issues used primarily as a synonym for problem. Please pay little very little attention my earlier outburst. It was presented in jest by way of exaggerating my feelings on this issue, er, problem.
The funny thing about this is that the younger staff in my org (40 and under) are constantly being told by the older staff (50-70) not to use the word "problem," especially by the electeds. It's like "conflict" or "disagreement." We don't have conflict in the organization we have "differences of opinion" and we don't disagree we have "creative differences." The stupid thing is none of those three, problems, conflict and disagreement, are necessarily unhealthy or inherently negative. Conflicting ideas are how you develop a good product; disagreements are the only way to develop solid strategies. It's about how you manage those conflicts and disagreements and whether the leadership is confident and competent.
The funny thing about this is that the younger staff in my org (40 and under) are constantly being told by the older staff (50-70) not to use the word "problem," especially by the electeds. It's like "conflict" or "disagreement." We don't have conflict in the organization we have "differences of opinion" and we don't disagree we have "creative differences." The stupid thing is none of those three, problems, conflict and disagreement, are necessarily unhealthy or inherently negative. Conflicting ideas are how you develop a good product; disagreements are the only way to develop solid strategies. It's about how you manage those conflicts and disagreements and whether the leadership is confident and competent.
Oh yeah. I realize it's the older folks that did this to all of us. And the younger folks don't even know it happened in most cases. And your examples illustrates the motivations very well. They want things to sound sweeter. It's like pissin' on someone's leg and tellin' 'em it's sterile liquid. Yes indeed, sterile liquid sure does SOUND a whole lot better than piss. Don't it? LOL But, doesn't it really mean you just got pissed on just the same? Yep. But, We think it's better this way. Here's another example. "Going forward". WTF does that mean? Apparently, it means the same damn thing as "in the future" or "from now on" but somehow you sound smarter saying it that way. (If that makes sense, then how come saying "going backward" when you really mean "in the past" doesn't have the opposite connotation? OK, never mind that.) So how come it sounds better? It does make you sound better somehow or all those speech writers wouldn't have our president say "going forward" over and over during his speeches. Hell, you could get drunk pretty quick if you turned it into a drinking game. Right? Take a shot every time he says "going forward". Oh and bonus double shots every time he says "let me be clear". LOL Pretty dang drunk pretty dang quick.
Comments