The future of Jihad?

Puff_Dougie

jd50ae

ISIS threatened 1000s of single acts of murder.

Ken Light

Worst. Jihad. Ever.

webmost

Puff_Dougie

Ken Light:

Worst. Jihad. Ever.

Officer Kenneth Healey, whose head was cracked open by that hatchet, would probably beg to differ. But this is my point: If the focus of Muslim extremists moves decidedly in the direction of individual random acts of terror perpetrated by self-radicalized loonies like this guy, it's a whole new kind of threat. If this sort of attack gains momentum and becomes more widespread, how do we respond? Personally, I'm becoming much more consistent in exercising my 2nd amendment rights. Just sayin' that this is a disturbing trend.

Ken Light

Puff_Dougie:

Ken Light:

Worst. Jihad. Ever.

Officer Kenneth Healey, whose head was cracked open by that hatchet, would probably beg to differ. But this is my point: If the focus of Muslim extremists moves decidedly in the direction of individual random acts of terror perpetrated by self-radicalized loonies like this guy, it's a whole new kind of threat. If this sort of attack gains momentum and becomes more widespread, how do we respond? Personally, I'm becoming much more consistent in exercising my 2nd amendment rights. Just sayin' that this is a disturbing trend.

The point of an act of terror is to use a small number of pawns to strike fear in the hearts of many orders of magnitude more pawns and maybe a couple higher-ranked people. This was a silly one-for-one trade. Beyond that, if we still all carried guns like in the 1800s, it wouldn't even be effective in most 1 for 1 trades. Kinda sad that an act of aggression that wouldn't have worked hundreds of years ago works now.

Ken Light

Ken Light:

Puff_Dougie:

Ken Light:

Worst. Jihad. Ever.

Officer Kenneth Healey, whose head was cracked open by that hatchet, would probably beg to differ. But this is my point: If the focus of Muslim extremists moves decidedly in the direction of individual random acts of terror perpetrated by self-radicalized loonies like this guy, it's a whole new kind of threat. If this sort of attack gains momentum and becomes more widespread, how do we respond? Personally, I'm becoming much more consistent in exercising my 2nd amendment rights. Just sayin' that this is a disturbing trend.

The point of an act of terror is to use a small number of pawns to strike fear in the hearts of many orders of magnitude more pawns and maybe a couple higher-ranked people. This was a silly one-for-one trade. Beyond that, if we still all carried guns like in the 1800s, it wouldn't even be effective in most 1 for 1 trades. Kinda sad that an act of aggression that wouldn't have worked hundreds of years ago works now.

If I were a conspiracy theorist, I'd be all over this ish, because it makes no sense at all. How did the officer not see that guy coming? The guy comes at a camera, which is presumably mounted on a wall or roof of some sort. So how could the officer be facing away from him? Was he looking in a storefront window? WTF was he doing?

webmost

Ken Light