Thank you for posting this. I'm going to the studio tomorrow and I'm so pumped to just set that place on fire now. Mediocrity should not be accepted, let alone lauded.
Wow, now we're debating what's good music and what sucks? That's an awful deep rabbit hole. My only point was to declare that a band should play instruments. The Beatles were definitely a band. Whether anybody liked them or hated them is irrelevant to the definition of band. But, if five singers sing in front of a unnamed and virtually unseen "backing band" then, IMHO you are not supposed to call those five vocalists a band. They may be the big stars of their big stage act but they are not a band.
Wow, now we're debating what's good music and what sucks? That's an awful deep rabbit hole. My only point was to declare that a band should play instruments. The Beatles were definitely a band. Whether anybody liked them or hated them is irrelevant to the definition of band. But, if five singers sing in front of a unnamed and virtually unseen "backing band" then, IMHO you are not supposed to call those five vocalists a band. They may be the big stars of their big stage act but they are not a band.
You distinguished boy band from band. So I said The Beatles were a boy band. Implying, but most anyone would call them a band. So can we distinguish boy band and band?
Wow, now we're debating what's good music and what sucks? That's an awful deep rabbit hole. My only point was to declare that a band should play instruments. The Beatles were definitely a band. Whether anybody liked them or hated them is irrelevant to the definition of band. But, if five singers sing in front of a unnamed and virtually unseen "backing band" then, IMHO you are not supposed to call those five vocalists a band. They may be the big stars of their big stage act but they are not a band.
You distinguished boy band from band. So I said The Beatles were a boy band. Implying, but most anyone would call them a band. So can we distinguish boy band and band?
I believe the general understanding of "boy band" would be star vocalists out front in the spotlight, unnamed musicians in the shadows providing musical accompaniment. There may be some room for the Beatles to be called both in that they drove the teenage girls crazy in the beginning but I'd call them a band.
Wow, now we're debating what's good music and what sucks? That's an awful deep rabbit hole. My only point was to declare that a band should play instruments. The Beatles were definitely a band. Whether anybody liked them or hated them is irrelevant to the definition of band. But, if five singers sing in front of a unnamed and virtually unseen "backing band" then, IMHO you are not supposed to call those five vocalists a band. They may be the big stars of their big stage act but they are not a band.
You distinguished boy band from band. So I said The Beatles were a boy band. Implying, but most anyone would call them a band. So can we distinguish boy band and band?
Comments