I actually cannot believe that anyone would use a Michael Moore movie as a statement of fact. They are entertaining, and I've watched them, but they are loosely based on fact at best. Using one of his movies as a reference is like me using a Tom Clancy novel to prove a point. "But did you see how Jack Ryan handled that??"
I guess this has pretty much been mentioned, but not directly, that the title of this post is totally untrue and misleading as well. Nobody here has called for "no regulation." As Kuzi has mentioned many times before, regulation is needed, and only needed, to make sure a company does not violate the rights of the people.
I just don't understand how me attempting to "forward your personal views" is any different than you doing the same thing on here... So freedom to post your personal views only applies if you agree with them? Seriously read your post man. You do the same thing and post about your personal views, but when we do it you go off the handle. Why is there any difference? And no I don't think you are pissed or need to calm down, but if you feel you shouldn't debate here then i respect that and wish you well.
kuzi is at it again...u shud run for office kuzi..
i respectfully decline.
You wouldn't last anyway. You seem to have morals and stand up for what you believe in. Not many people like that in Washington anymore.... For either party!
Comments