About the medicaid portions; Obama admin argued that they had the power to force States to accept increased medicaid funds, then force the States to spend it as the Feds dictate. USSC ruled that Feds can't force States to accept Obamacare medicaid funds, while they can still accept regular medicaid funds - if States accept Obamacare funds, then Feds can force them to spend it as the Feds dictate, but if States don't accept it, then they can spend their medicaid funds as they please
Im not an attorney, but I know enough about law...and common sense....that Citizens United was a crap decision and a political one------so when the Court itself is "politicking" as you say, how are we to have faith in the system?
Wow----the continuing attack on my person continues-----classy my man, classy. I guess since I dont know sh!t as you say, I will keep my opinions to myself. Your well known right wing sentiments Im sure have no impact on your feelings about any decisions as you as able to be totally unbiased while the rest of us cannot, correct? Thanks again for the attacks man. Im out
Wow----the continuing attack on my person continues-----classy my man, classy. I guess since I dont know sh!t as you say, I will keep my opinions to myself. Your well known right wing sentiments Im sure have no impact on your feelings about any decisions as you as able to be totally unbiased while the rest of us cannot, correct? Thanks again for the attacks man. Im out
Stay out of my profession; you don't know jack about law, and I'm pissed that you're making assumptions you do.
You practice constitutional law? Also, does this also mean you will not speak of things you are not an "expert" in? IE---Politics?------Your goading me into this here and I shoudl take the high road and stop btw.
So because you disagree it's judicial activism-----but its right and just in the citizens united decision. You also got mad as I was accused of attacking or pretending to know your profession-----but now youre espousing to be a better judge of constitutional law than our Supreme Court----------am Im the one who "talks down" to people?
Hmm, I suppose I was wrong that it's judicial activism; the Obama lawyers did ask the USSC to interpret it as a tax when they were making their arguments, so I stand corrected on that point. My bad.
Lollll...I love the Republican spin. For the last several months, this was unconstitutional and Obama was over stepping. Now, Mr. Rubio and the other talking heads line is "the Supreme Court decides what is and is not constitutional, not what is good or bad policy". I love politics, both sides, when their desires as squashed and they try to make it sound like a good thing.
I wouldn't be surprised in the long run that if this bill is not abolished it will easily move the US economy into the lower 10 range which means China, Japan, Germany, Brazil, UK, Russia, India, and Canada will probably be ahead of the US in 20 years. In case you were wondering the bill will add 1.73T USD to the US debt immediately upon being put into effect and I believe 200M a year to upkeep it every year with even higher taxes. Shoulda payed more attention when I was learning this stuff..
I wouldn't be surprised in the long run that if this bill is not abolished it will easily move the US economy into the lower 10 range which means China, Japan, Germany, Brazil, UK, Russia, India, and Canada will probably be ahead of the US in 20 years. In case you were wondering the bill will add 1.73T USD to the US debt immediately upon being put into effect and I believe 200M a year to upkeep it every year with even higher taxes. Shoulda payed more attention when I was learning this stuff..
You do realize that at least most, if not all of the countries you think will be ahead of us, already have what we're trying to get. What they DON'T have, is a bill for 48% of all the military spending on the planet. WE do.
Wow----the continuing attack on my person continues-----classy my man, classy. I guess since I dont know sh!t as you say, I will keep my opinions to myself. Your well known right wing sentiments Im sure have no impact on your feelings about any decisions as you as able to be totally unbiased while the rest of us cannot, correct? Thanks again for the attacks man. Im out
Stay out of my profession; you don't know jack about law, and I'm pissed that you're making assumptions you do.
LOL...nice to see not much has changed, huh Mac? lol
Wow----the continuing attack on my person continues-----classy my man, classy. I guess since I dont know sh!t as you say, I will keep my opinions to myself. Your well known right wing sentiments Im sure have no impact on your feelings about any decisions as you as able to be totally unbiased while the rest of us cannot, correct? Thanks again for the attacks man. Im out
Stay out of my profession; you don't know jack about law, and I'm pissed that you're making assumptions you do.
LOL...haven't been around in awhile but nice to see not much has changed, lol
Wow----the continuing attack on my person continues-----classy my man, classy. I guess since I dont know sh!t as you say, I will keep my opinions to myself. Your well known right wing sentiments Im sure have no impact on your feelings about any decisions as you as able to be totally unbiased while the rest of us cannot, correct? Thanks again for the attacks man. Im out
Stay out of my profession; you don't know jack about law, and I'm pissed that you're making assumptions you do.
LOL...haven't been around in awhile but nice to see not much has changed, lol
The more things change, the more they stay the same
Comments