I'm hoping all countries involved will listen to the evidence on this. You know I don't know what is worse, the false chest beating from our country and our allies or the BS that Assad is swinging? Or hell even that Russia keeps standing up for this country when/or if they have used these weapons. Though really killing is killing and it really doesn't matter how it is done does it? Sad thing is Obama had to go a head and beat his chest too, now they are walking back statements. It's one thing for some whack-a-doo congress person or senator to beat their chest and attack, it's another for the president to do so. I thought we didn't have a cowboy in office anymore.
So if Diane says it's okay I guess we should believe her, I mean she knows all about rights and law and all that stuff.
Are you serious?
...no, I am not. California voters need to clean house and start with her and work their way down a bit. I'm sick of these people who say one thing and then keep doing the opposite. I cannot believe the skin on this witch over how she has handled not only the policy of this war making but how she treats fellow senators when they challenge her on this bogus crap.
One other thing that bothers me in this instance is the lack of the question of CAN we intervene, do we really have the capability? Perhaps someone who is active can correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like our units, particularly the combat arms, are worn out and need time to recover. Perhaps the Air Force and Navy elements that were not too heavily engaged in Iraq and Afghanistan, but if that's the thinking those in charge need to do some reading from, ohhhh say, 1975 and 2003 to see that that is not a very effective solution against low-tech enemies.
I gotta say Obama is brilliant. He just said that he has authorized a strike but wants congress to approve it. So, no matter what, he has stood by his 'red line' and when Congress says no way, then he will blame them. Simply brilliant.
I gotta say Obama is brilliant. He just said that he has authorized a strike but wants congress to approve it. So, no matter what, he has stood by his 'red line' and when Congress says no way, then he will blame them. Simply brilliant.
I was thinking the same thing. no matter what happens now he can just say it was not his fault.
I gotta say Obama is brilliant. He just said that he has authorized a strike but wants congress to approve it. So, no matter what, he has stood by his 'red line' and when Congress says no way, then he will blame them. Simply brilliant.
I was thinking the same thing. no matter what happens now he can just say it was not his fault.
And still yet it will be him at fault because he has the Veto power. In a situation of wartime he has the last word. So either way he looses.
I gotta say Obama is brilliant. He just said that he has authorized a strike but wants congress to approve it. So, no matter what, he has stood by his 'red line' and when Congress says no way, then he will blame them. Simply brilliant.
I was thinking the same thing. no matter what happens now he can just say it was not his fault.
And still yet it will be him at fault because he has the Veto power. In a situation of wartime he has the last word. So either way he looses.
Except that the media will tell the public that Obama did the right thing and congress is to blame and the stupid people will believe the media.
Finally in this country we have a decent showing of biparisanship.....of course the congress is acting together in things none of us want--------My County tis of Thee.
Comments